Skip to content
Audit language · Strengthen structure · Draft from a brief

The last read before it goes on file.

You wrote the accommodation letter. The RTW plan. The note to the insurer. Draft Studio reads it back the way an adjudicator will, before it leaves your desk.

25 founding seats · CAD $99/mo
What Draft Studio is

You bring the draft. Eunosa reads it back.

It does not write the file for you. It reads what you wrote, and tells you what an adjudicator will see in it.

Draft Studio is the careful second read: what an adjudicator will see in the phrasing you chose, what is already on file, and what is missing before the case closes.

Three reads

One draft. Three kinds of read.

  1. Audit language

    Draft Studio flags medicalizing phrasing in your draft and sets a functional alternative beside it, so the file reads the way you would want a worker to read it.

    …the worker remains unmotivated to return to work despite the offer…

    Flagfacing obstacles that have not yet been named
  2. Strengthen structure

    Draft Studio reads your draft against what an adjudicator looks for, and tells you what is already on file and what is missing before the file closes.

    On fileAccommodation options considered and named
    MissingThe date you first asked. An adjudicator looks for it.
  3. Draft from a brief

    Give Draft Studio the facts in a sentence or two. It returns a structured first draft, cited where it should be, for you to edit and make your own.

    “Worker cleared for modified duties, four hours a day. Employer has not confirmed availability.”

    Returns
A read in full

The read, in the margins.

Paste a draft and Draft Studio reads it the way a senior colleague would: a mark on the phrasing that would have read badly, a note in the margin where the file has a gap. Here is an IME request, mid-edit.

Draft · IME requestIn review

We are writing to request an independent medical examination for the above-noted employee. She was offered modified duties beginning March 12th but has refused to cooperate with the transition plan, citing unspecified concerns. The attending physician's note does not address functional limitations in adequate detail.

She is considered highly non-compliant with the rehabilitation schedule. The coordinator notes she remains unmotivated to return to work despite the offer on the table. Please advise on her current limitations and a prognosis for full duties.

Flag

highly non-compliant

experiencing barriers to participation

Flag

refused to cooperate

has not yet been able to confirm availability

Flag

unmotivated to return to work

facing obstacles that have not yet been named

Gap

No record of the inquiry you ran. Before an IME, an adjudicator looks for the clarifying letter and the date you sent it.

A sample IME-request draft. Draft Studio has flagged three medicalizing phrases — “highly non-compliant”, “refused to cooperate”, and “unmotivated to return to work” — each with a functional alternative, and noted one structural gap: there is no record of the inquiry the consultant ran before requesting the examination.
After the read

Every read, kept.

A read does not end when you close the draft. The audit becomes a Reference Card. The phrases you settled become Language Refs. Draft Studio feeds the same library the rest of your Workspace builds, so the catch you made in March is still there in November.

The audit · saved as a Reference Card
Case 2024-088

IME request · language and structure review

May 20263 flags · 1 gap
The phrase · saved as a Language Ref

refused to cooperatebecomeshas not yet been able to confirm availability

Saved from Draft Studio · IME request

Both live in your Workspace, beside every thread you have ever opened.

Before you send it

Before it goes on file, you get to know what an adjudicator will see in it.

25 founding seats open —